Tag Archives: intellect

Easily led automatons

The title of today’s post might seem pretty rude and disrespectful of a large chunk of people (once I get into the meat of my post this morning you’ll understand), but it’s how I feel today. And just for the record, this post relates indirectly to my post earlier this morning, That Evil Condom and the commentary that enused last night over a recent post on contraception.

One of my favorite comments from the movie Clerks (or was it Clerks 2) is the brush-off by the character Randal of some folks as “easily led automatons.”

This is a view that many have of Christians and others with belief in a conscious God. The notion is that they cannot think for themselves and have to be led around by someone else and force-fed spiritual hogwash to make themselves feel better.

For my part, I believe critical thinking has a very good place in religious discussions, but there are those who stubbornly insist on devouring the dogma handed down by spiritual leaders instead of focusing on the truth handed down by God. And those people contribute to the notion that Christians are merely automatons; puppets. Our source for understanding God is the Bible. Our pastors and preachers and evangelists and priests and all the rest can help us understand, they can teach from the Bible, they can help guide…but they aren’t the source of the truth.

I go on (often) about things I dislike about the Catholic Church, and for good reason. This is a huge Christian denomination that is riddled with man-made rules and with doctrine that is at times counter to the Bible instead of supporting it. It is a church that doesn’t encourage believers to read the Bible (nor does it dissuade them directly, but Protestant denominations are much more into expecting people to bring a Bible to church, read along, and go home and read some more). Of course, there are plenty of Protestants and other Christian types out there who would prefer to just be told what to believe by a pastor or something; it’s just that the Vatican is the one organization that has most institutionalized this mindset.

God did not give us our brains so that we could park them at the door and let someone think for us. God gave us His word and with the advent of the printing press it became widely available (even more so now with the Internet), and He expects us to learn from it. We are to follow Him and not pastors or other men when it comes to things spiritual. Christians who argue my points often try to counter me by pointing me to books and videos and lectures and the like, but too few of them actually are willing to refute me from God’s word.

Christians aren’t the only ones, by the way. In a post a while back, I was in a vigorous debate about the existence and divinity of Jesus and one commenter, Ben, was arguing that Jesus’ story was simply a rehash of Egyptian mythology. And he pointed me to this very nicely produced video explaining all the parallels. Problem is, those parallels don’t exist, and they reflect both a modern reinterpretation of an Egyptian god superimposed on an older revision in which that sect gave its god a makeover in response to Jesus and made their god more like Jesus.

OK, I know what’s coming. “But Jesus’ birthday and all sorts of other Christian celebrations were re-tooled to correspond to pagan holidays. So there!” Yes, yes, yes. And that was unfortunate. But it was marketing. Ill-advised marketing. It was a way to appeal to the pagans. Jesus himself was not rewritten to correspond to pagan gods; the church simply made up holy days to get Jesus introduced to people. I don’t agree with that choice, but it wasn’t a reinvention. No matter how many times people say Jesus was a copycat, he was in fact a really unique cat. But because this is what people want to believe when they dislike what the Bible has to say, they simply accept the arguments at face value instead of looking for a real breakdown about who Jesus was and he fails to correspond to supposed predecessor god, like this breakdown here.

So, “everyone” does it, Christian or not. Across the spectrum, people follow men instead of seeking God. Why? Because too many people don’t want to bother to think for themselves. The reason that religion, and the world in general, are such a mess is because we follow “leaders” instead of searching for truth, justice and revelation and then following God.

The world is full of automatons. And there are a relatively small number of people who want to (and succeed) in making those automatons move and think just the way they want them to. Please don’t fall into that trap.

Random thought

mind-body-spirit.jpgWell, I might have skipped a post today if Nsangoma had showed up to back up his bluster. But since he hasn’t, yesterday’s post looks like it will be quickly winding down, and I’d feel bad if there wasn’t something new here today for people who take time to visit. So, just a random thought about spirituality, emotion and rationality.

And that thought it that we cannot be complete without all three.

Emotion is part of who we are, from anger to tears to love. To wallow in any of them is bad, but to deny them is, I think, worse. Nothing saddens me so much than to see a person of faith who eschews showing emotion or who starts to think that love or guilt are the only ones that should define us.

Rationality is part of being human and part of our ability to express our divine spark. Our intellect is a gift from God and it sets us apart from every other creature on this planet. We shouldn’t forget how to think, and how to question those who lead us, both within and outside religious circles. Don’t trade in critical thinking for faith; let them strengthen each other.

And finally, spirituality. I’ve touched on the spiritual vs. religious thing already once, and given the nature of this blog, it should be no mystery to anyone that I think the fate of your eternal soul depends on that spirituality being the embrace of the Holy Spirit, through faith in Jesus the Christ and love toward God the Father. That being said, I can’t make you believe in that path, only hope that you will consider taking it (if you haven’t already). But I respect the faith choices of every person. Regardless of whether I believe that choice is right for your soul, I respect your free will, and I respect that you are trying to express your spiritual side. And I feel sadness for those who dwell only in the worlds of the rational and/or emotional and forget to reach for the divine.

Because like it or not, we are beings with spirits…souls…and to think otherwise and to assume we are just genetic accidents of random, thoughtless creation…well, that seems to be the emptiest and saddest thing in the world.